Security report: Windows vs Linux

Monday, 25 October 2004, 1:29 PM EST

Much ado has been made about whether or not Linux is truly more secure than Windows.

The results were not unexpected. Even by Microsoft's subjective and flawed standards, fully 38% of the most recent patches address flaws that Microsoft ranks as Critical. Only 10% of Red Hat's patches and alerts address flaws of Critical severity. These results are easily demonstrated to be generous to Microsoft and arguably harsh with Red Hat, since the above results are based on Microsoft's ratings rather than our more stringent application of the security metrics. If we were to apply our own metrics, it would increase the number of Critical flaws in Windows Server 2003 to 50%.

By Nicholas Petreley at The Register.

[ Read more ]




Spotlight

The context-aware security lifecycle and the cloud

Posted on 25 November 2014.  |  Ofer Wolf, CEO at Sentrix, explains the role of the context-aware security lifecycle and illustrates how the cloud is shaping the modern security architecture.


Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.
  



Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.
  

DON'T
MISS

Wed, Nov 26th
    COPYRIGHT 1998-2014 BY HELP NET SECURITY.   // READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY // ABOUT US // ADVERTISE //