Open source versus closed source security

Friday, 1 October 2004, 12:29 AM EST

When you use a closed source system, in many cases you're also using a closed system (to some degree or another). Understanding how something works (which is important when securing a system), or the processes through which it was made, can oftentimes be difficult or impossible, as the only readily available insight into this information in the documentation provided by the vendor. This, however, has the interesting side effect of making attacks against such a system more difficult. An attacker typically needs to understand a system before he can find and exploit a vulnerability in it. Security by obscurity you say? Perhaps. It really depends on whether or not the system or project *depends* on the closed source nature of the source code for security.

By Jason Miller at SecurityFocus.

[ Read more ]




Spotlight

Most popular Android apps open users to MITM attacks

Posted on 21 August 2014.  |  An analysis of the 1,000 most popular free Android apps from the Google Play store has revealed a depressing fact: most of them sport an SSL/TLS vulnerability that can be misused for executing MITM attacks, and occasionally additional ones, as well.


Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.
  



Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.
  

DON'T
MISS

Thu, Aug 21st
    COPYRIGHT 1998-2014 BY HELP NET SECURITY.   // READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY // ABOUT US // ADVERTISE //