RFID users say no privacy law needed
A U.S. law enforcing privacy rules for radio frequency identification (RFID) isn't needed because companies experimenting with the technology are committed to protecting privacy, two such corporations told a U.S. House subcommittee yesterday.
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. continues to move forward with plans for case- and pallet-level tagging of products with RFID chips. But most item-level tagging, where individual products are identified with RFID chips, is about 10 years away, Linda Dillman, executive vice president and CIO of Wal-Mart, told the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection.
But others at the hearing noted that Wal-Mart conducted product tests on lipstick in an Oklahoma store in early 2003, prompting Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) to question whether consumers were adequately warned of the tests. With the potential to use RFID chips in passports and other government identification, as well as consumer products such as clothing, the misuse of RFID tracking raises "seriously Orwellian concerns," she said.
By Grant Gross at Computerworld.
[ Read more ]
- News: RFID's secret path to ROI (3 June 2004)
- News: HP debuts RFID services (11 May 2004)
- News: Watchdogs push for RFID laws (5 April 2004)
- News: German revolt against RFID (1 March 2004)
- News: Defense Department wants RFID tags on everything but sand (24 October 2003)
- News: RFID ripples through software industry (30 September 2003)
- News: Let's see some ID (18 July 2003)
- News: RFID spy-chippers leak confidential data on the Web (11 July 2003)
- News: RFID chips are here (27 June 2003)