Windows vs. Linux security: No unbiased reports

Monday, 12 July 2004, 10:43 AM EST

Forrester Research published a report last March that came to the unlikely conclusion that Linux is no more secure than Windows. Last month, Danish security firm Secunia compared security across operating systems and concluded that Windows was more secure than many people think. Both studies are easy to counter with a little research and common sense, but that still leaves us without any meaningful third-party operating system security assessment.

Forrester measured the time between the discovery of a flaw and the release of a fix for the flaw -- a worthwhile metric, but one that's almost meaningless by itself. If there's any professional analysis and comparison of the severity of the flaws in Windows versus Linux, it never made it to press coverage about the report, and my editors haven't authorized my spending the $900 Forrester charges for the details.

By Nicholas Petreley at NewsForge.

[ Read more ]




Spotlight

Lessons learned developing Lynis, an open source security auditing tool

Posted on 15 October 2014.  |  Lynis unearths vulnerabilities, configuration errors, and provides tips for system hardening. It is written in shell script, installation is not required and can be performed with a privileged or non-privileged account.


Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.
  



Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.
  

DON'T
MISS

Mon, Oct 20th
    COPYRIGHT 1998-2014 BY HELP NET SECURITY.   // READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY // ABOUT US // ADVERTISE //