Forrester questions Linux security
A new study from Forrester Research has concluded that the Linux operating system is not necessarily more secure than Windows. The report finds that on average, Linux distributors took longer than Microsoft to patch security holes, although Microsoft flaws tended to be more severe.
But leading Linux vendor Red Hat said that while Forrester's underlying figures were sound, its conclusions didn't give an accurate idea of relative security, as they failed to distinguish between patch times for critical updates and routine, obscure problems.
By Matthew Broersma at LinuxWorld.
[ Read more ]
- Review: Essential System Administration Pocket Reference (5 January 2004)
- Review: HackNotes Linux and Unix Security Portable Reference (24 October 2003)
- Review: Linux Security Cookbook (29 September 2003)
- Review: Linux Server Hacks (10 September 2003)
- Review: Linux+ Certification Bible (3 September 2003)
- Review: Hacking Exposed Linux 2/e (8 May 2003)
- Review: Linux Administration Handbook (30 April 2003)
- Review: Linux System Security: The Administrator's Guide to Open Source Security Tools, 2/e (14 March 2003)
- Review: Real World Linux Security, 2/e (22 November 2002)
- Review: Linux System Administration - A User's Guide (18 August 2002)