Forrester questions Linux security

Monday, 5 April 2004, 1:34 PM EST

A new study from Forrester Research has concluded that the Linux operating system is not necessarily more secure than Windows. The report finds that on average, Linux distributors took longer than Microsoft to patch security holes, although Microsoft flaws tended to be more severe.

But leading Linux vendor Red Hat said that while Forrester's underlying figures were sound, its conclusions didn't give an accurate idea of relative security, as they failed to distinguish between patch times for critical updates and routine, obscure problems.

By Matthew Broersma at LinuxWorld.

[ Read more ]

Related items




Spotlight

(IN)SECURE Magazine issue 45 released

(IN)SECURE Magazine is a free digital security publication discussing some of the hottest information security topics. Learn about personal data bankruptcy and the cost of privacy, security and compliance, delivering digital security to a mobile world, and much more.


Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.
  



Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.
  
DON'T
MISS

Thu, Mar 5th
    COPYRIGHT 1998-2015 BY HELP NET SECURITY.   // READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY // ABOUT US // ADVERTISE //