Who's more secure than whom?

Friday, 2 April 2004, 2:57 AM EST

Forrester concludes that Microsoft is, on average, faster than Linux vendors at fixing known vulnerabilities, but that Windows has more of them than Linux. I could quibble with a lot of these numbers, but I think it's more important to recognize that they are all in the ballpark with each other.

A Linux advocate could have a lot of arguments with Forrester's positions. For instance, Forrester tracked the distribution of patches by Linux distributors, specifically Red Hat, Suse, MandrakeSoft and Debian. When a patch comes out for a Linux bug, it will often come out first in another venue, such as kernel.org or apache.org. At this point, the distributors have to do some testing before they issue their own advisories and code. It's often possible for Linux users to patch their systems faster than the Forrester research assumes.

By Larry Seltzer at eWeek.

[ Read more ]




Spotlight

Cloned, booby-trapped Dark Web sites steal bitcoins, login credentials

Apart from being a way for dissidents and journalists to do their business without being spotted and identified by "the powers that be", the Dark Web is also a place where criminals sell and buy illegal wares and services and, apparently, where they also get robbed by scammers.


Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.
  



Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.
  
DON'T
MISS

Fri, Jul 3rd
    COPYRIGHT 1998-2015 BY HELP NET SECURITY.   // READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY // ABOUT US // ADVERTISE //