Founders of a new antispam service say they have developed a system to convince spammers to remove specific e-mail addresses from their mailing lists, but two major spam-fighting groups are warning potential subscribers to stay away.

The service, offered by San Antonio, Texas-based Global Removal, charges subscribers a $5 lifetime fee to have their e-mail addresses put on a permanent do-not-spam list. Addresses on the list are then compared with, and removed from, mailing lists maintained by Global Removal's partnering businesses -- more than 50 known spammers and an equal number of legitimate e-mail marketers.

Global Removal CEO Tom Jackson believes that, unlike other attempts at creating do-not-spam lists, his company's system will work because it gives spammers an incentive to cooperate: money.

Although businesses that sign up to partner with Global Removal agree to remove addresses from their lists for free, they are enrolled in an affiliate program that earns them $1 for every new subscriber that they bring to the service.

[ Read more ]

Related items

• News: Antispam companies raking it in (9 September 2003)
• News: Are we outsmarting spam? (5 September 2003)
• News: How some spammers get your e-mail (3 September 2003)
• News: Use DSPAM to reduce spam from a Linux mail server (2 September 2003)
• News: A support group for spammers (2 September 2003)
• News: The only ways to stop spam and viruses (25 August 2003)
• News: Unholy matrimony: spam and virus (12 August 2003)
• News: 'Do not spam' lists find skeptics (11 August 2003)
• News: Swollen orders show spam's allure (7 August 2003)
• News: Spam dumpster diving (31 July 2003)
• News: A new tool for combating spam (17 July 2003)
• News: Could hackers launch a denial-of-spam attack? (15 July 2003)
• News: We've found the perfect solution to spam (9 July 2003)
• News: Dutch mass spammer loses grip (7 July 2003)
• News: Spam peddlers hijack computers (3 July 2003)
• News: US anti-spam laws 'will legalise spam' (2 July 2003)
• News: Defending your site against spam (30 June 2003)
• News: How viruses (and your PC) are used to send spam (30 June 2003)
• News: Toward a spam-free future (25 June 2003)
• News: HP to ship antispam software on new PCs (19 June 2003)
• News: Microsoft takes spam fight to court (18 June 2003)
• News: Anti-spam proposals get tougher (17 June 2003)
• News: Spam 'more of a menace than hackers' (13 June 2003)
• News: FTC: blame foreigners for spam (12 June 2003)
• News: Corporate spam overtakes legitimate e-mail (3 June 2003)
• News: Spam tsunami (2 June 2003)
• News: Europe imports an American problem - spam (2 June 2003)
• News: Congress slams spam (23 May 2003)
• News: Microsoft and Symantec give Senate recipes for frying spam (22 May 2003)
• News: You've got spam (very likely from a hijacked computer) (21 May 2003)
• News: Testers angry over spam-blocking fees (21 May 2003)
• News: Feds prime new antispam weapon (16 May 2003)
• News: Spam attempts to scam Bank of America customers (14 May 2003)
• News: Before friday comes spamday (12 May 2003)
• News: EarthLink sues the 'Buffalo spammer' (8 May 2003)
• News: Is spam behind a cell-phone virus? (5 May 2003)
• News: Best way to stop spammers? Make them pay! (5 May 2003)
• News: Are blacklists killing more than spam? (2 May 2003)
• News: Fight spam with SpamProbe (2 May 2003)
• News: Virginia threatens spammers with jail (1 May 2003)
• News: Go hunting for spammers (30 April 2003)
• News: Rise of the spam zombies (28 April 2003)
• News: Antispam activist claims court victory (9 April 2003)
• Article: Iraq Dragged Into The Infamous 419 Scam (7 April 2003)
• News: Spam pips viruses as biggest web problem (4 April 2003)
• Article: Spam Checklist - April Fool's Day is Approaching (27 March 2003)
• Article: Spam Wars - Rise of the Spam (16 May 2002)
• Article: Spam: The problems with junk e-mail (8 April 2002)
• Article: Mail Abuse Prevention Organization stands up to giant Harris Interactive (4 April 2002)
• Article: The six headed spam monster (1 April 2002)