Internet service providers: the little man's firewall?

Monday, 8 September 2003, 1:43 PM EST

A large percentage of malicious traffic is focused on a small number of vulnerabilities and their associated ports[1]. Blocking some of these ports will isolate infected machines and slow the spread of malicious, autonomous code such as worms. However, the vulnerable services used by these worms do have legitimate uses. If secured properly, they can be used without the risk of infection. In this paper, we focus on ISPs that provide Internet access to consumers. This paper assumes that a consumer is a home user or a small business without dedicated IT staff. This paper does not apply to backbone infrastructure providers or co-location providers.

In part of this paper, we argue for blocking ports commonly used for Microsoft File sharing and related services; specifically, ports 135, 137, 139, and 445. These ports and, in particular, Microsoft File Sharing, draw a lot of attention from malware authors.

[ Read more ]




Spotlight

Chrome extension thwarts user profiling based on typing behavior

Infosec consultant Paul Moore came up with a working solution to thwart a type of behavioral profiling. The result is a Chrome extension called Keyboard Privacy, which prevents profiling of users by the way they type by randomizing the rate at which characters reach the DOM.


Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.
  



Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.
  
DON'T
MISS

Wed, Jul 29th
    COPYRIGHT 1998-2015 BY HELP NET SECURITY.   // READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY // ABOUT US // ADVERTISE //