Know your attacker

Wednesday, 21 March 2007, 10:09 AM EST

Which is more secure, a product wherein one security flaw is found each year -- but is only fixed six months later -- or a product wherein one equally serious security flaw is found every week -- but where it only takes a day before the flaw is corrected? This question underlies most attempts to compare the security records of open- and closed-source software; Microsoft's Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox come to mind as a good example. More security flaws are uncovered per unit time in Firefox than in Internet Explorer, but they also tend to be fixed sooner, leaving (at least by some reports) a smaller number of "days of vulnerability". Like most good questions, the answer to this one is "it depends". In this case, it depends upon whom you're worried about defending against.

At Daemonic Dispatches.

[ Read more ]




Spotlight

Best practices for ensuring compliance in the age of cloud computing

Here are the major considerations organizations should incorporate into their compliance programs, as well as pitfalls that can be avoided to ensure businesses stay compliant while using cloud computing.


Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.
  



Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.
  
DON'T
MISS

Thu, Sep 3rd
    COPYRIGHT 1998-2015 BY HELP NET SECURITY.   // READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY // ABOUT US // ADVERTISE //