Responsible bug disclosure by corporate fiat

Thursday, 31 October 2002, 1:53 PM EST

I must have a masochistic streak. Nothing else could explain why I occasionally argue in this space that people should act responsibly when disclosing holes in software. If I even hint that the doctrine of full disclosure has limits, the reaction is overwhelming. Among other things, I've been called a Microsoft lackey, a fascist, and "just a plain dolt." You'd think I was criticizing CISSPs.

Most of the negative feedback seems to stem from the belief that I'm opposed to full disclosure. In fact, I'm not.

But I believe that it's time for the security community to develop a broadly supported model for disclosing security vulnerabilities. This model should ultimately result in full disclosure of every security hole in every application. Just not all at once.

[ Read more ]




Spotlight

Proactive real-time security intelligence: Moving beyond conventional SIEM

Discussions about security intelligence still focus primarily around conventional reactive SIEM. Security pros need to move from this reactive model to proactively using this security intelligence to protect their businesses.


Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.
  



Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.
  
DON'T
MISS

Fri, Aug 28th
    COPYRIGHT 1998-2015 BY HELP NET SECURITY.   // READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY // ABOUT US // ADVERTISE //