Gearing Up For July 1, 2003 - Senate Bill 1386 - How Does It Affect You?
by Melisa LaBancz - IT Journalist - Friday, 30 May 2003.
On July 1, 2003, Senate bill 1386 becomes Civil Code 1798.82. In a nutshell, the law states that any person or company doing business in the state of California is responsible for notifying California residents of security breaches to their non-encrypted information. It is important to note that the actual breach does not need to occur in the state of California for the law to apply. As long as a company is doing business in the state, "doing business" defined as: having a registered agent in the state of California, having a physical office, contracting to do business with vendors in the state (parts manufacturers, suppliers), or having retail outlets in the state, they are liable to notify their California customers. However, if you are strictly a mail order business, with no ties to California except your online customers, this law may not apply to you at all.

Most corporations are going to take the path of least exposure, i.e., letters mailed to affected customers. Interestingly, there is no language in this law governing what the notification has to say, and whether or not it has to be easily understood by the customer. Even more compelling, this law applies worldwide, to any company doing business in the state, regardless of what they sell and whether or not they know that such a law exists.

As Marc Zwillinger, chair of the Information Security and Anti-Piracy practice group at Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal in Washington D.C. states, "Most corporations do not routinely segregate data related to California residents from other customer or employee data, this [law] may have a significant effect on how companies across the U.S. handle IT issues."

Important to Understand

The events that trigger this law are best summed up in an excerpt that reads: '...acquisition of computerized data in non-encrypted form by an unauthorized personÖ' Since the law does not specify information that was acquired due to unauthorized conduct, the law doesn't necessarily require a company to disclose every act of employee misconduct.

"Data" in this case is defined as the first name, last name, and any combination of the following: Social Security Number, driver's license number, account number, debit or credit card information. The caveat being that the data acquired has to be non-encrypted. Should a security breach occur to a database housing encrypted customer data, the law does not apply.

From a Technical Perspective

It isn't possible to prepare for every security breach, but comprehensive response plans must be in place. Nationwide, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is aggressively cracking down on corporations; enforcing the edict that requires IT to maintain sufficient security and response programs to protect their customer data.

"Preventative measures are important, but do not constitute compliance." affirms John Patzakis, President and CEO of Guidance Software, "Administrators will need to have a forensic plan in place to detect these incidents, especially internal incidents and fraudulent acquisition of customer data. Computer forensics determine what and when specific data was compromised."

Suggestions for Getting Ready


Harnessing artificial intelligence to build an army of virtual analysts

PatternEx, a startup that gathered a team of AI researcher from MIT CSAIL as well as security and distributed systems experts, is poised to shake up things in the user and entity behavior analytics market.

Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.

Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.

Mon, Feb 8th