The impact of false positives on web application security scanners
As regards the other web application security scanners, I think all of us, including Netsparker should start focusing a bit more on finding new and innovative ways on how to verify our findings and avoid reporting false positives. Web vulnerability scanners are not what they used to be 5 years ago, they came a long way. Many of them can detect vulnerabilities that 5 years ago we didnít think it was possible to detect using automated means. So from that aspect, all web security scanners as a whole improved. But by increasing automation, false positives also increased. So, whatís the point in increasing automation when penetration testers and web security experts still have to verify a scannerís findings?

To me it seems as if most software vendors are looking in the wrong direction. I think it is a good to improve coverage and report more vulnerabilities, but the industry should listen to what the market wants; Identifying the most common web vulnerabilities without having to verify them. Else false positives will always be a stigma for automated web application security scanners.

Spotlight

Bash Shellshock bug: More attacks, more patches

Posted on 29 September 2014.  |  As vendors scramble to issue patches for the GNU Bash Shellshock bug and companies rush to implement them, attackers around the world are probing systems for the hole it opens.


Weekly newsletter

Reading our newsletter every Monday will keep you up-to-date with security news.
  



Daily digest

Receive a daily digest of the latest security news.
  

DON'T
MISS

Tue, Sep 30th
    COPYRIGHT 1998-2014 BY HELP NET SECURITY.   // READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY // ABOUT US // ADVERTISE //